Cities work with developers to ensure new developments and improvements are safe and consistent with community goals.
Answer: When developers approach cities to subdivide land (make smaller parcels out of a larger tract), developers must follow the land use rules (the city’s zoning laws and “subdivision ordinance”) established by the city for the benefit of its residents. Cities work with developers to ensure improvements like new streets, sidewalks, trails, sewer, water lines, and stormwater systems are safe and in good working condition, and the project is consistent with the standards of existing properties.
Answer: Development fees cover the city’s costs related to the review, approval, and inspection of the development. City review of a proposed subdivision application may involve significant staff time as well as the services of planners, attorneys, engineers, and other professionals who are often contract consultants. Cities are authorized in state law to seek reimbursement for these costs.
Answer: The review and inspection are completed to protect residents and property owners. For example, future residents of the development can be confident that the grading of lots and design of the stormwater system will work together to prevent flooding in an extreme rain event that could occur after a developer has completed the structure and sold the property. In addition, the city (i.e. taxpayers) “own” improvements to things like streets and sewers, and benefit from the work being done correctly.
This process also ensures that the development meets the city’s health, safety, and welfare standards, which are described in city ordinances. Common charges include sanitary sewer and water hook-up and access charges, which provide for services like plumbing and clean drinking water. In addition, cities have authority to require developers to dedicate a reasonable portion of land within the development to public use for such resident needs as streets, utilities, and park areas.
Answer: Cities could choose to incorporate the development-related costs into their budget, which could be done by increasing property taxes for existing property owners. Cities could also choose to do the improvements themselves and recoup the costs through special assessments from the new property owners. Or cities could choose to not finance the development costs, which would halt the development.
Answer: While this is an option, there are some significant risks to cities. For example, if the city installs the public improvements but the developer doesn’t finish the project or the subdivided lots do not sell and sit empty, the city will face delays in recovering their costs and could be forced to charge taxpayers for the bill.
Answer: Cities set fees to cover costs incurred by reviewing, investigating, and administering an application. State law requires that these fees must be fair, reasonable, and have a connection (nexus) to the actual cost of the service for which the fee is imposed. In addition, the need must be roughly proportional to the size and proposed use of the development. For example, in a five-house subdivision, it may be reasonable to require dedication of land for a small public playground, but not multiple acres for a community park. Some fees are required to be based on the appraised value of the land. On request, a city must explain the basis of its fees.
Answer: Subdivision regulations vary from city to city because each city has different development and planning goals, which are tailored to the unique attributes of their community. For example, one city may value preservation of agricultural space, while another city values the creation of affordable housing. Some fees are required to be based on the appraised value of the land, which is an additional reason why they can be different from city to city and even from neighborhood to neighborhood.
Cities can require a written contract known as a “development agreement.” Development agreements are negotiated between the city and developer and detail the fees and specifications of the project. This give-and-take can ultimately reflect the unique characteristics of the project and can provide flexibility in fees and requirements. Regardless, statutory cities are not allowed to require a cash fee for the construction of future road improvements as part of a development agreement.
Answer: If there is any leftover money, those funds are returned when all required conditions of the development are met.